The Hate You Give, vs.
Optomists Die First
The Hate you Give is a book far outside my frame of reference and
experience. The book speaks to the
experience of a poor black female in a racially tense American ghetto. It is a book with a message, both personal
and political. The book speaks about the
struggles and injustices perpetrated and experience by both sides of the racial
divide - the white establishment, and the black “gangster”. But while the book tries to promote an
understanding of racial tension from both sides of a complicated issue, it
became cumbersome and complicated, with too many threads that did not really
tie together realistically. The book becomes preachy, with stereotyped
conflicts moving to full-blown crises exceptionally quickly, and with
unrealistic changes of personality occurring almost overnight (witness Starr
going from reluctant witness to bomb throwing protestor in one fell swoop.)
There are sections of the book that recite reams of information, not because it
adds to the plot, but because the author has a political message to
convey. This is information that is
politically important, but feels like it a lecture.
One of the greatest
strengths of The Hate You Give, is
Starr as a main character. She works
through complicated and dynamic relationships.
Almost as well created are the characters of the father and mother, and
possibly Uncle Carlos (less so). But
woven in to these complicated and interesting lives are flat characters that
seemed unrealistic. Perhaps the most
unlikely is Ofrah, a community organizer and activist, and interestingly
uninteresting. Another disappointment
is DeVante, a character that could have had much more depth, but comes across
as a case study.
The Hate U Give is quite preachy, with the story lectured
to the reader. It is an important story
because of its message, and I felt like I should empathize or at least
sympathize with the story line. At least
for me, I felt almost guilty that the
importance of the story was overshadowed by the perceived “literary finger
wagging”, and shallow supporting characters.
Almost…
Optomists Die First initially had my attention.
I liked the Canadian setting in Vancouver and Toronto, with timbits
thrown in to make me feel at home. The
pace is fast moving, and I liked the flow of the story line. Unfortunately, I was bothered by the
representation of Mental Health issues.
Within the first 5 minutes of reading this book the protagonist has
obsessively used hand sanitizer, fainted during a presentation, and checked
bookshelves to ensure shelves would not fall over. Symptoms were frequent but inconsistent, like
haphazardly opening the DSM* and pointing your fingers at random to another
mental health issue. The characters seemed to be defined by nothing more than
their mental health issues.
It is not that the book
was poorly written, but the portrayal of the subject matter of mental health is
both simplistic and stereotyped. For
example, Petula suffers from (among a plethora of other mental illnesses)
anxiety, but this anxiety miraculously dissipates once Petula falls in
love. The love itself is a kind of
“insta love” that by definition, should be shallow, but ended up being deeply
felt, with a very mature and adult like understanding of the tension between
telling the truth and wanting to maintain a perceived persona. In a book that is dealing with the
complicated issues of mental health, it is incongruous that the very real
issues of “perceived self” vs. ‘true self” can be so lightly ignored.
So… admittedly, I did not
make it through the book. I liked the
“quirkiness” of some of the characters.
I liked the plot, although it was highly predictable. But the shallow depiction of a serious issue
like mental health, the predictability of the plot, and the unrealistically
deep understanding of relationships in a young, anxiety bound, adolescent
character had me closing the book before I read another DSM diagnosis.
*DSM: Diagnostic Statistic Manual. Used by mental health professionals to
identify psychological and psychiatric disorders.
Our vote: The Hate You Give, but more by default than
merit.
I just have to say I disagree with most of this post. Hate U Give was a 5/5 read for me. It does have a political message to convey - all the best books do. I happen to agree with this one. I didn't find it stereotyped, sadly I find that I can turn my tv on and find this played out again and again. I agree it is complicated but so is this issue and this book is a great way to open up and have conversations. To be clear the main character is not poor - that is one of the story lines and many of the other characters I would not describe as black "gangsters" - that's where the complication comes in.
ReplyDeleteI'm curious if Henry speaks for all of the group because I've not met many people who did not find this book outstanding.
I for one really enjoyed The Hate You Give (though I probably didn't convey it to Henry at the time of his writing this post). I found it challenged a lot of my own thoughts regarding this issue and really made me think. I found the vernacular initially challenging but by the end of the book I found it wasn't an issue. I agree that as a literary work there were definitely areas lacking (as stated so eloquently by Henry), but for me that didn't take away from the overall message and my enjoyment as a reader.
ReplyDelete