This was a
difficult bracket to judge because we all really enjoyed the literature;
however, the more we discussed the great elements of each text, the easier it
became to see that there was one obvious winner. With that we delve into the genocide
of a people vs. teen angst bracket:
The Year of Beasts
The
Year of Beasts is filled with wonderful imagery, descriptive
language, a contemporary setting and circumstances that students could relate
to. The characters were believable without being overly cliché and the
technique of weaving in the graphic novel portion with the regular text was
really effective and deepened the meaning and impact of the story. The graphic
portion of the novel showed in an artistic way what the main character felt she
was experiencing even though no one else could see it. Lastly, The Year of Beasts did a better job of
tying the story back around to a complete finish, which started at the
beginning.
Between
Shades of Grey
In our discussion of Between Shades of Grey we agreed that it deals with a more noble
and important topic. Prior to reading the novel, our collective knowledge about
the Lithuanian deportation was minimal and this may have affected our
experience with the text. The characters were realistic and it was interesting
to see how each of them reacted to the horrible conditions they were forced to
exist in. Between Shades would be a
good addition to a unit that looks at the Holocaust, where we commonly will use
the Anne Frank story, as a way of comparing other similar events. Between Shades of Grey may
be the better story of the two and the topic allows for more cross-curricular conversations. One element that worked effectively for the
novel was how the chapters were punctuated with poigniant, often
emotion-filled, lines; For example, "It was the last time I would look
into a real mirror for more than a decade." or "I looked back to the
hole. What if we were digging our own
graves?”
The
Big Reveal…
One realization
that we came to prior to our decision is that we needed to put through
the novel that is best suited for our teen audiences. We liked both novels, but
felt that one was more unique, better written, had more emotional pull that
would appeal to a greater range of kids. Although we LEARNED more in one, we FELT
more in the other.
This bracket
appears to be the case of an interesting novel that we all thought was superior
vs. an average novel that is probably supposed to win – please see Dia’s pre-round predictions. Ultimately there was a
connection to the narrative in The Year
of Beasts that was missing from Between
Shades of Grey.
Sorry
Arlene…
Unanimously, The Year of Beasts is the novel to advance to the next round!
No apologies necessary. I wonder if Dia didn't drink too much reindeer juice over the holidays and is still feeling the effects because while I did enjoy Between Shades of Grey, and agree with your learn lots vs felt explanation of why it didn't more forward, it was not my book. I can't believe that Dia forgot which was my book but then again she is getting on in age.... It's okay, Dia, we understand but still love you.
ReplyDeleteP.S. I look forward to reading The Year of the Beasts!
ReplyDeleteThere is a thin brown liquid line (oh Diet Coke how I worship you) that stands between all of you and me....that and a tiny dose of dementia. If you had seen Arlene's geek love for the novelist at out conference you could understand my error. Now where is my can of DC and my cane...I'm coming for you Arlene.
ReplyDeleteJust finished The Year of the Beasts but will reserve comment until all of my peeps have read both our titles for this round!
ReplyDelete