Brad:
This is certainly the first "former-student-now-colleague" dialogue I
have ever engaged in for Smackdown. I'm a little terrified that we might
not be in any sort of agreement over these two, and I'm not ready to lay the
smack this early in the tournament. How about we kick off this convo with
three-word-descriptions of our two books?
Alexa:
Could we possibly be in
disagreement over these two? I think I'm willing to lay some smack. Three-ish
words....
Tune It Out: "Hip." Semi-endearing heroine.
The Radium Girls: It was radium.
Brad: Oh, you're clever. You aren't tipping your hat to me about The
Radium Girls yet. I think my selected three words might make my thoughts pretty clear:
The Radium Girls: Grotesquerie. Borderline (?)
offensive.
Tune It Out: Alright. But problematic.
I am no fan of the
"fictionalized historical accounts for young adults" form that keeps
popping up in Smackdown; I think there is something disingenuous at best, and
ethically comprised at worst, when we generate liminal narrative that is
neither fiction nor non-fiction, but the conceit is that THIS IS HOW IT
ACTUALLY HAPPENED (see Bomb. And The Nazi Hunters.
And that bizarre book about the Romanoffs). The Radium Girls wants
us to empathize with these real women who endured unspeakable horrors,
but keeps R.L. Stine-ing these horrors for MAXIMUM! YUCHY! EFFECT! to the point
where...these real women become IRreal--plot points for a circus
of gross-outs with LOTS! OF! ADJECTIVES! AND! EXCLAMATION! POINTS! Wait.
Did you like it?
Alexa:
No!! Of course I didn't like it! It was pulling teeth just getting through part
one, and then somehow it stretched into three parts, where
every other chapter ended with the predictable, groan-eliciting, "It
was the radium." 500 pages describing various women who, despite
the uNiQuE descriptions of their fashionable clothes and hairstyles, have
blended into "radium girl" in my mind, going through the loss of
teeth, limb, and life, over, and over, and over. The proclaimed purpose of
telling the story of brave girls who fought for justice and change rang hollow,
flattening their experience to a handful of quotations supported by weird
hypothetical action to try to bring the story to life. I am in complete
agreement with your issue of not-fiction-not-non-fiction. I'd like to see merit
in easing young readers into non-fiction in this way, but it was just
frustrating and confusing. It was repetitive (!!!), inconsistent, and full of
irritating quirks like beginning far too many sentences with coordinating
conjunctions, irresponsibly using italics far too liberally, and throwing in
random transitions such as, "The Lord works in mysterious ways." WHAT?!?!

Brad: It's hard to enjoy a book that purports to historically document the
bravery of these women, beginning with the exhortation that "[e]ven though
they're not with us anymore, these amazing women live on"--and then
identifying each of these ladies reductively, repeatedly and almost exclusively
by their hair styles. AND! THEN! HER JAW! FELL! OFF! It's ghoulishly
exploitative.
Alexa: Fact: open the book to any page, and there will certainly be a
necrotic jaw OR trendy bob reference within your first skim. I can't get over
it.
Brad: Thoughts on Tune It Out,
then? Certainly not without its own problems....
Alexa: Ok. I'm interested to hear your thoughts on Tune
It Out, because I read it second and it was such a refreshing alternative
to The Radium Girls that I'm almost ready to give it a... glowing
reference. I thought it was extremely predictable, definitely a little
corny, but I did find it amusing at times; I feel like the tween relatability
of Lou and Well was reached for, but fell short of charming. The sensory
processing disorder…was it tokenistic? Would kids with similar experiences feel
a genuine connection with how it was portrayed? Was Lou's miraculous
overcoming-of-fear realistic? All of this, I do not know. Your turn.
Brad: It’s
weird how many pretty BIG things I found problematic (predominantly the way
poverty and social class is dealt with, and the fact that we are to believe
that Lou is twelve years old [sidebar: I seriously thought this would
somehow be a plot point/twist in the book], and a wet thud of a hurried final
act, and….) and yet…there are some terrific passages. And Sumner has an ear for
dialogue that rings true, sometimes turning what initially seems like a stereotypical
character into to someone multi-faceted and...interesting? While many of the “hip”
references fall flat, almost as many sort of charmed me (although…there’s an
expiration date on this book—half the references will be EMOJI SHRUG in two
years). The book is…okay? But some serious reservations. Final thoughts for
your first Smackdown round ever?
Alexa: I see what you mean - reinforcing harmful stereotypes is not on my
teaching agenda, and Tune It Out employs them perhaps rather..
obliviously?
My final thoughts: The Radium Girls should
end its journey here, for being generally offensive and having significantly
fewer "shining" moments, if there were any at all. Tune It Out may
move on, but I can't say I would recommend it to a student (in good
conscience). I'm looking forward to round two!
ROUND ONE: Two
begrudging votes for Tune It Out.
P.S.: Mr. McBean?
Zorrie is terrific. Top
three of the NBA Fiction Longlist IMHO.